There is a lot talk these days, especially with the current political climate, about how things "should" be. The ideal is certainly something that we want to be working towards, but we also need the skills (and programs, support, money, laws, etc.) to deal with the reality of what is.
I worked with a wonderful voice teacher that taught me how to make intelligent choices about where and where not to breathe in a song. In a perfect situation, the composer has aligned text phrases with musical phrases that aren't too long to perform in one breath. In reality, what a poet has to say in one phrase of text may extend through two, three, or even four musical phrases. Or the musical phrase and the text phrase may match up, but be impossibly long for the singer. Or the musical and text phrases may not line up at all.
Even when you have that perfect musical/text match-up that works well within what the singer can do in one breath, problems can arise. I was sick for nearly a month before my last performance. My asthma means that breathing for singing is the last thing to return to normal. And being nervous will also change how your body uses the air, so you may have many "surprise" deviations from the breathing plan during a performance.
If we only teach a student where the ideal breathing spots are, we leave them vulnerable when they go into a situation similar to that last performance of mine. But I did just fine. And you know why? Because the same teacher that taught me how to make the best possible choice for a place to breath also taught me how to cope when that is just plain not going to happen. I think we do a disservice to our students when we only prepare them for the ideal and don't teach them how to deal with the less than ideal.
I believe that too many kids have sex way too early. I'm OK with abstinence being the ideal. But for many people it is not the reality. If all we teach is abstinence, we leave these kids vulnerable to pregnancy, disease, and heartbreak. I am a huge supporter of sex-education, ideally in the home, but since that is not a reality for a lot of people, it does need to be available elsewhere. For years I've toyed with the idea of selling condoms to parents to give to their kids when they have that talk. For the Mormons, the condom itself would say "CTR", Choose the Right, a phrase the kids have heard since childhood. We could do "WWJD" for our Evangelical Christian friends. The parents can say, "I think you should wait because (fill in the blank with your religious/moral view), but if you do have sex, please be safe." Then the kid carries it in a purse or wallet and has one final reminder from Mom/Dad/God before they make that big decision. It may encourage them to wait. Or it may just mean that they come home not pregnant and disease free. Are people really willing to sacrifice the lives of so many because ideally you shouldn't have sex until married, so we're not even going to talk about it and how to help the people that are having pre-marital sex?
Now that half of the people quit reading because they were offended, I'll continue on with one more example and this one is far less controversial.
I certified this weekend to teach Tai Chi. We spent a lot of time working on refining our own performance of the form and talking about how to work with the elderly and people with diseases and disabilities. We learned to model the form for our students, showing them the way it should be. We also learned that safety and comfort are more important than doing the movements the "right" way. We learned the ABC's of Tai Chi: Always Be Comfortable. We can help students adapt the form to make it more comfortable for their current physical condition. In the perfect world, we would all be thin, with joints and muscles that functioned properly, and brains that enabled clear thinking and memory. But if I only teach to that ideal, the people that need Tai Chi the most won't be able to do it. Heck, I wouldn't be able to do it.
One of the most beautiful things mentioned in the Tai Chi training was that Tai Chi is an internal art, not an external one. If we get caught up in the choreography we miss the real benefits. What the body does on the outside is a way of enabling the internal, but the mind is a powerful thing. If all a student can do is think about moving their hand, they still benefit.
I'm not opposed to teaching the ideal. In fact, I think it is important. We need to know where we want to go, what we want to achieve. But we also need to deal with the realities of the here and now. And failure to talk about that reality and find ways to cope with it leaves a lot of people in the dark, alone and afraid.
